Artificial intelligence has become a daily tool for employees across industries. But when staff use generative AI without approval, or paste sensitive data into public models, it creates a new category of insider threat. This phenomenon is often called shadow AI, the use of AI tools outside sanctioned corporate policies. Shadow AI is now one of the fastest growing risks for enterprises, and it is already leading to litigation, regulatory fines, and reputational damage.
What Shadow AI Means
Shadow AI refers to employees using generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, or Copilot without organizational oversight. Unlike sanctioned AI use, shadow AI bypasses compliance checks and data governance. The danger is that confidential information fed into these tools may be stored, logged, or even used to train future models. Once that happens, the data can resurface in unexpected ways.
How AI Leakage Happens
The process is deceptively simple. An employee copies proprietary code, contracts, or client data into an AI tool to get help with debugging or drafting. That data is then transmitted to external servers. Depending on the provider’s policies, it may be logged or retained. In some cases, it can be incorporated into training datasets. From there, the information could appear in search results, be retrieved by other users, or be exposed in a future breach.
The timeline from copy/paste to exposure varies. In some cases, leaked data has appeared in public forums within weeks. In others, it may take months before the information surfaces in search results or is discovered during audits. The key point is that once data leaves the organization’s controlled environment, it is effectively out of its hands.
Real World Examples
- Samsung (2023): Engineers pasted proprietary source code into ChatGPT while troubleshooting. The incident triggered a global ban on generative AI tools for employees, with Samsung citing the risk of intellectual property leakage (LinkedIn, Oct 2025).
- Law Firms and Finance (2024–2025): Several firms faced litigation after employees used AI to draft contracts or analyze financial data. Confidential clauses and client details were inadvertently exposed, leading to lawsuits alleging breach of fiduciary duty and failure to safeguard client data (Risk Insights Hub, May 2025).
- GDPR Violations in Europe (2025): Regulators investigated cases where HR staff fed employee records into AI tools to generate performance reviews. This was classified as illegal processing of personal data under GDPR, opening the door to fines and litigation (NITSIG, June 2025).
Expanding the Insider Threat Definition
Traditionally, insider threats were divided into malicious insiders, negligent insiders, and compromised insiders. Shadow AI introduces a new dimension. Employees may not intend harm, but by using unsanctioned AI tools, they create leakage risks that are just as damaging as deliberate sabotage. Gartner’s 2024 survey found that 59 percent of employees admitted using unapproved AI tools at work, underscoring how widespread the issue has become (LinkedIn, Oct 2025).
Legal and Reputational Consequences
The fallout from AI leakage is significant. Companies face lawsuits from clients whose data was exposed, regulatory fines for privacy violations, and reputational damage when leaks become public. In industries like healthcare and finance, where confidentiality is paramount, even a single AI related leak can cost millions. Ponemon Institute’s 2025 report estimated the average annual cost of insider threats at $17.4 million, with negligent incidents like shadow AI contributing heavily (DeepStrike, 2025).
The Path Forward
Organizations need to treat shadow AI as a core insider threat. That means:
- Establishing clear policies on AI use.
- Training employees on the risks of pasting sensitive data into public tools.
- Deploying monitoring systems to detect unauthorized AI activity.
- Offering sanctioned AI solutions so employees have safe alternatives.
The lesson is simple. AI can empower employees, but unmanaged use can expose organizations to massive risk. Shadow AI is not just a productivity shortcut, it is an insider threat vector that requires immediate attention.
Sources
- LinkedIn: Insider Threat 2.0 – When AI Makes Leaks Unintentional (Oct 2025) https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/insider-threat-20-when-ai-makes-leaks-unintentional-yash-gorasiya-dvwdf/
- NITSIG Insider Threat Incidents Report (June 2025) https://www.nationalinsiderthreatsig.org/pdfs/insider-threat-threats-incidents-report-disgruntled-malicious-employees%206-30-25.pdf
- Risk Insights Hub: AI-Driven Insider Risk Management (May 2025) https://www.riskinsightshub.com/2025/05/ai-insider-risk-detection-2025.html
- DeepStrike Insider Threat Statistics 2025 https://deepstrike.io/blog/insider-threat-statistics-2025
Leave a Reply