Artificial intelligence has become a daily tool for employees across industries. But when staff use generative AI without approval, or paste sensitive data into public models, it creates a new category of insider threat. This phenomenon is often called shadow AI, the use of AI tools outside sanctioned corporate policies. Shadow AI is now one of the fastest growing risks for enterprises, and it is already leading to litigation, regulatory fines, and reputational damage.
Shadow AI refers to employees using generative AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, or Copilot without organizational oversight. Unlike sanctioned AI use, shadow AI bypasses compliance checks and data governance. The danger is that confidential information fed into these tools may be stored, logged, or even used to train future models. Once that happens, the data can resurface in unexpected ways.
The process is deceptively simple. An employee copies proprietary code, contracts, or client data into an AI tool to get help with debugging or drafting. That data is then transmitted to external servers. Depending on the provider’s policies, it may be logged or retained. In some cases, it can be incorporated into training datasets. From there, the information could appear in search results, be retrieved by other users, or be exposed in a future breach.
The timeline from copy/paste to exposure varies. In some cases, leaked data has appeared in public forums within weeks. In others, it may take months before the information surfaces in search results or is discovered during audits. The key point is that once data leaves the organization’s controlled environment, it is effectively out of its hands.
Traditionally, insider threats were divided into malicious insiders, negligent insiders, and compromised insiders. Shadow AI introduces a new dimension. Employees may not intend harm, but by using unsanctioned AI tools, they create leakage risks that are just as damaging as deliberate sabotage. Gartner’s 2024 survey found that 59 percent of employees admitted using unapproved AI tools at work, underscoring how widespread the issue has become (LinkedIn, Oct 2025).
The fallout from AI leakage is significant. Companies face lawsuits from clients whose data was exposed, regulatory fines for privacy violations, and reputational damage when leaks become public. In industries like healthcare and finance, where confidentiality is paramount, even a single AI related leak can cost millions. Ponemon Institute’s 2025 report estimated the average annual cost of insider threats at $17.4 million, with negligent incidents like shadow AI contributing heavily (DeepStrike, 2025).
Organizations need to treat shadow AI as a core insider threat. That means:
The lesson is simple. AI can empower employees, but unmanaged use can expose organizations to massive risk. Shadow AI is not just a productivity shortcut, it is an insider threat vector that requires immediate attention.
Insider threats have quietly become the most persistent and costly cybersecurity risk facing organizations today.…
When the Malta tax office mistakenly sent sensitive company details to around 7000 recipients, the…
Insider threats are one of the most persistent risks facing organizations today. Whether malicious, negligent,…
In November 2025, the cybersecurity community was shaken by one of the most consequential breaches…
When most people think of insider threats, they picture rogue IT administrators or disgruntled engineers.…
Cybersecurity headlines often focus on zero‑day exploits, those mysterious vulnerabilities that attackers discover before vendors…
This website uses cookies.